Written by Kontak Recruitment
Last Updated: 13 July 2026
Estimated Reading Time: 8 minutes
Hiring a new employee is an investment in your business. Time and money are spent attracting candidates, conducting interviews, checking references, negotiating offers and onboarding new staff. Naturally, every employer hopes the appointment will be successful.
However, not every new employee proves to be the right fit. Some struggle to perform the duties of the role, others fail to meet expected standards, while some simply do not adapt to the workplace.
Can you dismiss someone during probation in South Africa?
The answer is yes, but only if there is a fair reason for the dismissal and the correct procedure is followed.
🎧 Prefer to listen instead?
Many employers mistakenly believe that an employee on probation has fewer rights than a permanent employee. While probation allows an employer to assess whether someone is suitable for a position, it does not remove the employee's protection under South African labour law.
Understanding how probation works is essential for every employer. Following a fair process not only reduces the risk of costly disputes at the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), but also demonstrates good employment practices that protect both the business and its employees.
By understanding the legal requirements surrounding probation and following a fair, well-documented process, employers can make informed decisions, reduce the risk of CCMA disputes and build a stronger workforce.
Probation is recognised under South African labour law as a legitimate way for employers to assess whether a newly appointed employee is capable of performing the duties of a position.
The purpose of probation is not to make dismissing employees easier. Instead, it provides employers with a reasonable opportunity to evaluate a new employee's performance, competency and overall suitability for the role before confirming their employment.
The Labour Relations Act (LRA), together with the Code of Good Practice: Dismissal (Schedule 8), provides guidance on how employers should manage probation fairly.
During probation, employers are expected to:
Clearly communicate the standards required for the position.
Monitor the employee's performance.
Provide appropriate instruction, training or guidance where necessary.
Address performance concerns as soon as they arise.
Allow the employee a reasonable opportunity to improve before considering dismissal for poor performance.
Employers who follow these principles are far less likely to face successful claims of unfair dismissal.
A probation period is an agreed period at the beginning of employment during which both the employer and employee assess whether the employment relationship is suitable.
For employers, probation provides an opportunity to evaluate whether a new employee has the skills, knowledge and attitude required to perform the role successfully.
Areas commonly assessed during probation include:
Technical ability.
Quality of work.
Productivity.
Attendance and punctuality.
Reliability.
Communication skills.
Ability to work independently.
Teamwork.
Adaptability.
Overall cultural fit within the organisation.
Probation also benefits employees by giving them an opportunity to determine whether the role, management style and workplace environment meet their own expectations.
To avoid misunderstandings, the probation period should always be included in the employee's written employment contract together with its duration and any performance expectations.
South African labour legislation does not prescribe a standard probation period.
Instead, the length of probation should be reasonable when considering factors such as:
The complexity of the role.
The level of responsibility.
The skills required.
The amount of time reasonably needed to assess performance.
Typical probation periods are:
Position Typical Probation Period
Entry-level positions 3 months
Administrative roles 3 months
Sales positions 3 - 6 months
Technical or specialist positions 3 - 6 months
Senior management positions 3 - 6 months or longer, where justified
Longer probation periods may be appropriate where the role requires specialised knowledge or where performance can only be properly assessed over an extended period.
One of the biggest misconceptions among employers is that employees on probation have very few rights. This is incorrect.
Employees on probation remain protected by South African labour legislation and are entitled to fair treatment throughout their employment.
Being on probation does not mean an employer can simply terminate employment without explanation or without following a fair process.
Employees continue to have the right to:
Be treated fairly
Work in a safe working environment.
Receive clear performance expectations.
Be informed when performance is not meeting the required standard.
Receive appropriate guidance where necessary.
Be given a reasonable opportunity to improve.
Be protected against unfair dismissal.
Understanding these rights is important because many disputes referred to the CCMA arise when employers incorrectly assume that probation removes these protections.
An employer may dismiss an employee during probation if there is a fair and legitimate reason supported by objective evidence.
Common reasons include:
Consistently poor work performance.
Failure to meet agreed-upon performance standards.
Lack of competence.
Repeated absenteeism.
Persistent lateness.
Misconduct.
Dishonesty.
Gross negligence.
Incompatibility with the role.
Failure to perform essential duties despite reasonable support.
Every situation should be assessed on its own merits.
Employers should avoid making decisions based on assumptions, personality conflicts or isolated incidents without first considering the surrounding circumstances.
The decision to dismiss should always be based on documented facts rather than opinion.
Poor performance is one of the most common reasons employers consider dismissing an employee during probation.
However, dismissal should generally be the final step rather than the first response.
A structured probation process gives employees a fair opportunity to understand what is expected of them, improve their performance and demonstrate that they are capable of fulfilling the role.
Employees should know exactly what is expected from them moment they begin employment.
Performance standards should be:
Clear.
Measurable.
Realistic.
Relevant to the position.
Communicated verbally and, where possible, confirmed in writing.
Employees cannot reasonably be expected to meet standards that have never been explained.
One of the biggest mistakes employers make is waiting until the final week of probation before discussing concerns.
If performance problems arise, they should be addressed as soon as possible.
Regular probation review meetings allow employers to discuss progress, identify challenges and agree on practical steps for improvement before problems become more serious.
Not every employee who struggles during probation is unsuitable for the position. Some simply require additional guidance, coaching or training.
Where appropriate, employers should consider providing:
Additional instruction.
Mentoring.
Job shadowing.
Constructive feedback.
Skills development.
Providing reasonable support demonstrates that the employer has made a genuine effort to help the employee succeed.
Employees should be given sufficient time to demonstrate improvement after concerns have been raised.
What is considered reasonable will depend on:
The complexity of the position.
The nature of the performance issues.
The employee's experience.
The support provided by the employer.
Employers should avoid rushing to dismissal before giving the employee a realistic opportunity to improve.
Good documentation is one of the strongest forms of protection available to employers.
Throughout the probation period, employers should keep records of:
Probation review meetings.
Performance discussions.
Coaching sessions.
Training provided.
Improvement plans.
Emails confirming expectations.
Written warnings where applicable.
If a dismissal is later challenged at the CCMA, these records can demonstrate that the employer acted fairly, reasonably and consistently.
Dismissal during probation is not always the result of poor performance. There are circumstances where an employer may consider immediate dismissal, particularly where serious misconduct has occurred.
Examples of serious misconduct may include:
Theft or fraud.
Assault or threats or violence.
Gross insubordination.
Serious dishonesty.
Deliberate damage to company property.
Serious breaches of workplace health and safety rules.
Harassment or discrimination.
Although serious misconduct may justify dismissal without first providing an opportunity to improve, employers should still ensure that a fair disciplinary process is followed. Employees should be informed of the allegations against them and given an opportunity to respond before a final decision is made.
Following a fair process helps protect the employer should the dismissal later be challenged.
Yes. In certain circumstances, extending a probation period may be more appropriate than dismissing an employee.
For example, an employee may demonstrate potential but require additional time to develop the skills or experience needed to perform the role successfully.
Before extending probation, employers should consider whether:
The employee has shown genuine improvement.
Additional training or support is likely to achieve the required standard.
The extension is reasonable under the circumstances.
Where probation is extended, employers should:
Discuss the extension with the employee before the original probation period expires.
Confirm the extension in writing.
Explain why the extension is necessary.
Clearly define the performance improvements expected.
Specify the new probation end date.
An extension should never be used simply to delay making a decision or to avoid addressing performance concerns.
Many unfair dismissal disputes arise not because the employer lacked a valid reason for dismissal, but because the probation process was poorly managed.
Some of the most common mistakes include:
Employees on probation remain protected by South African labour law. Assuming they can be dismissed without following a fair process is one of the most common employer errors.
Employees cannot be expected to meet standards that have never been communicated.
Clearly defining performance expectations at the start of employment provides a benchmark against which performance can be fairly assessed.
Performance concerns should be addressed as soon as they become apparent.
Leaving discussions until the final week of probation gives employees little opportunity to improve and weakens the employer's position if the dismissal is challenged.
Employers who fail to keep records of probation meetings, coaching sessions and performance discussions often struggle to demonstrate that a fair process was followed.
Good documentation can make the difference between successfully defending a dismissal and facing an adverse CCMA ruling.
Every probation assessment should take into account the complexity of the role, the employee's experience and the support provided.
Applying identical standards to every employee without considering individual circumstances may not always be appropriate.
If an employee believes they were unfairly dismissed during probation, they may refer the matter to the Commission of Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) or the relevant bargaining council.
During the process, employers may be required to demonstrate that:
There was a fair reason for the dismissal.
Performance expectations were clearly communicated.
Appropriate guidance or training was provided where necessary.
The employee was given a reasonable opportunity to improve.
The dismissal followed a fair procedure.
If the employer cannot demonstrate procedural and substantive fairness, the CCMA may find the dismissal to be unfair.
Depending on the circumstances, possible outcomes may include:
Compensation to the employee.
Reinstatement in certain cases.
Additional legal costs.
Significant management time spent preparing for and attending proceedings.
Following a structured probation process from the outset is often far less costly than defending an avoidable dispute.
Before making a final decision, employers should consider the following questions:
✔ Was the probation period included in the employment contract?
✔ Were performance expectations clearly communicated?
✔ Has the employee received appropriate guidance or training where necessary?
✔ Have performance concerns been discussed with the employee?
✔ Was the employee given a reasonable opportunity to improve?
✔ Have probation meetings and discussions been documented?
✔ Is there objective evidence supporting the dismissal?
✔ Has a fair procedure been followed?
✔ Has an extension of probation been considered where appropriate?
If the answer to several of these questions is no, employers should carefully reconsider whether dismissal is appropriate at that stage.
Yes. If there is a fair reason for dismissal and a fair procedure has been followed, employers do not need to wait until the probation period expires.
Yes. However, employers should first communicate the required standards, provide appropriate guidance where necessary and allow the employee a reasonable opportunity to improve.
Yes. Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed may refer the matter to the CCMA or the relevant bargaining council.
There is no specific legal limit, but any extension should be reasonable, justifiable and communicated clearly to the employee. Repeated extensions without good reason may be difficult to justify.
The appropriate process depends on the reason for dismissal. Poor performance and misconduct are treated differently, but employers should always ensure the employee has an opportunity to respond before a final decision is made.
Probation provides employers with an opportunity to assess whether a new employee is suitable for the role, but it should never be viewed as a shortcut to dismissal.
By setting clear expectations, providing appropriate support, documenting performance discussions and following a fair process, employers can make informed decisions that protect both their business and their employees.
Managing probation effectively not only reduces the risk of CCMA disputes but also contributes to stronger recruitment outcomes and a more productive workplace.
Need help Hiring Staff?
Looking to hire? Visit our Employers page, Submit a Vacancy online or Contact Kontak Recruitment to discuss your recruitment requirements.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational purposes and should not be regarded as legal advice. Employment matters vary depending on the circumstances of each case, and labour legislation may change over time. Employers should obtain professional labour law and legal advice before making a decision relating to employee dismissals.